By following the steps proposed in this tool, you will be able to identify barriers that your organisation face and define an action plan to overcome them effectively. A quick overview of the process is as follows:
Summary of the process for this tool
Steps | Description | Tools provided |
Step 1: Preparation | Identify key stakeholders within your organisation |
|
Step 2: Identify Barriers to green procurement | Identify barriers that would be relevant to your organisation in five key areas (identified through research as barriers to effective green procurement):
| List of barriers for each of the five key areas |
Step 3: Develop an organisation profile | Complete the self-assessment matrix | Self-assessment matrix |
Step 4 : Identify Priority areas for change | Identify issues with highest priority for change within your organisation based on the outcome of the self-assessment matrix. |
|
Step 5: Develop an action plan to overcome barriers | Develop a list of management steps, tasks to overcome the identified barriers and persons responsible for those tasks in order to increase the implementation of effective green procurement. | List of possible actions to overcome barriers in each of the five key areas |
If you don't have much time to go through the whole tool, you can identify the status of your organisation regarding green public procurement in order to identify priority areas for change and define an action plan to improve them.
To do so, use the table below and follow the next steps:
Level | Policy Case studies | Internal Awareness Case studies | Supply Market Case studies | Innovation Case studies | Regulation / Enforcement Case studies |
4 |
| Regular formal & informal programmes of training, staff awareness raising & information provision/practical guidance on green procurement at all levels | Regular formal programmes of supply chain management to improve environmental performance of services and products |
Formal and active programme of measures to introduce innovation in green procurement
| Internal regulations, systems and contract monitoring in place and fully operational to enforce the procurement of green products |
3 |
| Programme of staff awareness, training and information provision / practical guidance but no active, regular implementation
| Programme of supply chain management but no active commitment | Programme of measures in place but no active commitment | Internal regulations, systems and contract monitoring in place but no active, regular enforcement taking place |
2 | Unadopted policy set by manager but no commitment from top management
|
Some ad hoc staff awareness training and information provision
| Some ad hoc working with suppliers on environmental performance
| Some ad hoc innovation but no formalised programme of measures
|
|
1 |
|
Informal contact between colleagues used to raise awareness and promote green procurement on the bases of individual interest | Informal contact with suppliers on environmental performance |
Informal contact with other organisations for innovative measures but no real implementation | Guidelines but no written regulations for enforcement |
0 |
No green procurement policy in place or activity undertaken by any responsible person within the organisation | No promotion, awareness raising or information provision / practical guidance on green procurement | No liaison with suppliers
| No innovation measures in place
| No internal regulations, systems or contract monitoring measures in place |
The eventual aim is to move your organisation up through the levels towards ‘best practice’ performance and in doing so develop balance across the columns.
INTRODUCTION
2. STEP 2 – IDENTIFY BARRIERS TO GREEN PROCUREMENT
2.1 Lack of a Green Procurement Policy
2.2 Lack of Internal Awareness
2.3 Poor Supply Market
2.4 Lack of Innovation
2.5 Lack of Regulation/Enforcement
3. STEP 3 – DEVELOP AN ORGANISATION PROFILE
3.1 Aims of the Matrix
3.2 Completing the Matrix
4. STEP 4 - IDENTIFY PRIORITY AREAS FOR CHANGE
5. STEP 5 - DEVELOP AN ACTION PLAN TO OVERCOME BARRIERS
5.1 Policy
5.2 Internal Awareness
5.3 Supply Market
5.4 Innovation
5.5 Regulation/ Enforcement
6. CASE STUDIES
ANNEX of TOOL C
6.1 Methodology6.1.1 RELIEF Project
6.1.2 Similar Projects
6.1.3 Partners and Other Organisations
Although some public authorities practice green procurement, it is still not widely applied across Europe, and where it is applied it is not always effective. This is often due to internal organisational barriers that hinder the inclusion of environmental aspects in the public procurement processes. To increase effective green procurement in public authorities these barriers need to be overcome.
This document aims to provide a self-assessment tool to help public authorities across the EU to identify barriers that exist within their organisation and determine management steps that can be used to overcome them.
This tool aims to support both those starting out in green procurement and those who already practice green procurement to some extent but want to evaluate their current operations and see where improvements can be made.
The following table provides a quick view of the steps that need to be taken when dealing with barriers to green procurement.
Summary of process for this tool
Step 1 | Preparation | Identify key stakeholders within your organisation. Possibly staff involved in procurement and/or environment/sustainability. |
Step 2 | Identify Barriers to green procurement | Identify barriers that your organisation is experiencing or would be likely to experience in five key areas (identified through research as barriers to effective green procurement). These areas are:
|
Step 3 | Develop an organisation profile | Complete the self-assessment matrix to assess your current profile, to determine whether you have a balanced or unbalanced profile, and where the areas of strength and weakness to implementing green procurement lie. |
Step 4 | Identify Priority areas for change | Identify issues with highest priority for change within your organisation based on the outcome of the self-assessment matrix.
|
Step 5 | Develop an action plan to overcome barriers | From the priority areas identified in Step 4, develop a list of management steps, tasks and responsible persons for those tasks in order to overcome the barriers and, therefore, increase the implementation of effective green procurement. |
Before starting identifying barriers, you will need to identify the key stakeholders within your organisation that are/ would be involved in implementing green procurement. These could be those involved in procurement and those in environmental/ sustainability roles. Those at all levels of seniority should be identified. This will assist with gaining input and buy-in at an early stage from all that are/ would be involved in effective green procurement and will ensure that barriers throughout the organisation can be identified. Once this has been done you move to Step 2.
Once you've identified the key stakeholders within your organisation, you'll have to identify the barriers that your organisation is experiencing, or would be likely to experience, in implementing effective green procurement.
The barriers (identified through research undertaken in the development of this tool have been arranged into five categories, which are all key areas for the successful implementation of green procurement:
In order to identify your barriers, the first stage is to read through the barriers listed below and note down the ones that you would consider to exist in your organisation.
A policy stating the organisation’s position on green procurement is vital to provide clear aims and objectives and act as a driver for all those working within the organisation. Without a policy a universal approach cannot be achieved, as there is no focus or guidance for people on what they should be doing and why they should be doing it. Specific barriers in this category experienced are:
Information and awareness is vital to ensure all those within an organisation understand what they need to do, why they need to do it, how they need to do it and where they can access guidance. This can assist with change management and increase commitment within the organisation. If clear information is not available or actively imparted then it is very difficult to expect people to effectively implement green procurement. Key barriers experienced in this category are:
A good supply market of green products and services is a key requirement to implementing green procurement. Without suitable supplies an organisation cannot actively select to procure green options. The main barriers identified in this category are:
As green procurement is relatively new to many organisations, innovative and proactive measures can be needed to kick-start its implementation. Key barriers in this category are:
Change in behaviour can be difficult to achieve in organisations. Enforcement and regulation is a key way of ensuring that new policies and initiatives are adhered to, and ensuring that green procurement can be implemented. The main barriers identified in this category are:
To bring about the changes and development required for effective green procurement, organisations need to review how well they are currently performing, establish their current areas of strength and weakness assess the quality and level of support within the organisation and identify where they want to get to next. This will allow you to identify priority areas for change.
To establish your organisation's profile, the first task is to have to completed the self-assessment matrix outlined in Figure 1.1
The self-assessment matrix is divided into columns and rows. Each column of the matrix addresses the five key organisational issues that need to be addressed to allow effective implementation of green procurement:
The rows numbered from 0 – 4 represent increasingly developed organisational methods and activities to address these issues.
Once completed, the profile will portray your organisation’s current performance in these five areas, indicating how advanced they are, and whether there is a balance across them. The eventual aim is to move your organisation up through the levels towards ‘best practice’ performance and in doing so develop balance across the columns.
Level | Policy Case studies | Internal Awareness Case studies | Supply Market Case studies | Innovation Case studies | Regulation / Enforcement Case studies |
4 |
| Regular formal & informal programmes of training, staff awareness raising & information provision/practical guidance on green procurement at all levels | Regular formal programmes of supply chain management to improve environmental performance of services and products |
Formal and active programme of measures to introduce innovation in green procurement
| Internal regulations, systems and contract monitoring in place and fully operational to enforce the procurement of green products |
3 |
| Programme of staff awareness, training and information provision / practical guidance but no active, regular implementation
| Programme of supply chain management but no active commitment | Programme of measures in place but no active commitment | Internal regulations, systems and contract monitoring in place but no active, regular enforcement taking place |
2 | Unadopted policy set by manager but no commitment from top management
|
Some ad hoc staff awareness training and information provision
| Some ad hoc working with suppliers on environmental performance
| Some ad hoc innovation but no formalised programme of measures
|
|
1 |
|
Informal contact between colleagues used to raise awareness and promote green procurement on the bases of individual interest | Informal contact with suppliers on environmental performance |
Informal contact with other organisations for innovative measures but no real implementation | Guidelines but no written regulations for enforcement |
0 |
No green procurement policy in place or activity undertaken by any responsible person within the organisation | No promotion, awareness raising or information provision / practical guidance on green procurement | No liaison with suppliers
| No innovation measures in place
| No internal regulations, systems or contract monitoring measures in place |
To complete the matrix for your organisation, these steps should be followed:
1. Take a photocopy of the matrix. Review each column one at a time then mark the place in each column which best describes your organisation’s current methods and activities used to address each issue. The mark may be placed in a cell or between cells if this is more accurate. For example, if your organisation covers the criteria outlined in level 1 and is more comprehensive, but doesn’t quite meet the level 2 criteria then the mark should be placed between cells 1 and 2.
2. Once you have placed a mark in each column join up the marks to produce a graph line to create your Organisation Profile. This indicates how balanced green procurement is across your organisation. Examples of balanced and unbalanced Organisation Profiles are shown in Figure 2

3. Once completed make further photocopies of the matrix and ask the stakeholders identified in Step 1 (i.e. managers within your organisation involved in both procurement and environmental / sustainability issues) to complete the process in the same way. If different departments are responsible for different areas ensure all are given the opportunity to complete the matrix. This will help determine what others think are your organisational strengths and weaknesses in the area of green procurement.
4. Compare the Organisation Profiles collated and determine where they agree and disagree. If they disagree see if you can reach an agreed compromise position and draw this Profile on a new copy of the matrix. If you can’t agree, draw the separate Profiles on a new copy of the matrix and label each one, to represent the different points of view.
Having established your Organisation Profile, the next step is to identify the issues with the highest priority for change within your organisation. The following steps should be taken:
1. Working on your own, use the matrix / matrices collated and decide which columns contain issues that are a priority for change in your particular circumstances. It may not always be the columns with the lowest scores that are given immediate attention. If there are no obvious opportunities for improvement in these areas you may be better investing your time and attention on areas where changes and improvement can easily be made. Examples of different organisation profiles and indicated priority change areas are shown in Figure 3.
A. Organisation A has a fairly advanced policy and a good supply market but there is little internal awareness on green procurement, very little innovation and little enforcement. Priority areas for change are likely to be improving internal awareness and improving enforcement. Once awareness is increased it will be easier to introduce innovation.
B. Organisation B has an advanced policy and internal awareness, and fairly advanced enforcement but does not have a good supply market and has no innovation. Priority areas for change are improving the supply market to allow the requirements of the policy to be met, and encouraging innovation to explore different ways of implementing the policy.
C. Organisation C has an undeveloped policy, and very little innovation and enforcement, however internal awareness is fairly good and there is a supply market. The priority area for change is likely to be the development of a green procurement policy, and the development of enforcement measures to ensure the policy is adhered to.
2. Once you have compiled your priority list, ask senior managers to repeat the exercise with the agreed collated matrix from Step 1, or on their individual matrix if no compromise was reached, to determine their priority areas.
3. Collate and compare the lists received. If they disagree try to reach a consensus, if this is not possible amalgamate the list of priorities. Once finalised this list will be the key areas for change to be taken forward to the next step.
Having identified the key barriers to green procurement within your organisation, created your Organisation Profile, and established a list of priority areas for change; the fifth and final step is to develop an action plan for improved green procurement.
Listed in sections 5.1 to 5.5 are a number of actions that can be taken to overcome barriers in each of the categories of the matrix. These actions have been listed in order of priority to allow local authorities that are only able to adopt one activity to select the action that is likely to yield the highest returns.
To develop the action plan the following steps should be taken:
Step | Outcome |
1. Using your list of priorities, read through actions in relevant category/categories in sections 5.1 – 5.5 |
Identify which would be feasible to be undertaken within your organisation
|
2. For each action, identify who should be responsible for taking it forward, an appropriate timescale for doing so, and how progress should be measured |
Provides a focus for implementation
|
3. Develop a summary report of the outputs from Steps 2 – 5 of this tool
| Outlines where the key barriers lie to green procurement within your organisation (Step 2), what your current organisational strengths and weaknesses are (Step 3), what the key areas for change should be (Step 4) and the action plan, responsibilities and timescale for change (Step 5) |
4. Pass copies of the report to senior managers for comments and an agreement on the way forward
| This is an important stage, as top-level approval will help to ensure implementation. Once you have approval, put the action plan in progress |
Additional Resources
Additional Resources
Additional Resources
Paper - Imperial College London, UK | |
Supply Chain Challenge – Belfast City Council, UK | |
Green Procurement Initiative – Creative zones, UK | |
Enforcing Environmental Procurement Policy – London | |
Sustainable Building – Santa Perpetua de Mogoda, Spain | |
IT Consumables – Transport for London | |
Public Urban Transport Services, City of Goteborg, Sweden | |
Environmental Purchasing Program - City of Santa | |
Pencils - Ernst and Young | |
Energy – City of Plymouth Council | |
Green Procurement (GP) in Barcelona City Council | |
Green Procurement (GP) in Manlleu City Council |
To develop this self-assessment tool, the first step undertaken was research to identify the current common barriers to green procurement within organisations. This was done in the following ways:
In January 2001 a research project on green purchasing in Europe, named RELIEF (Environment Relief Potential of Urban Action on Avoidance and Detoxification of Waste Streams through Green Public Procurement, EESD-EVK-2000-00723), was undertaken. This project aimed to identify and understand the internal hurdles to implementing green procurement and understanding why implementation rarely meets expectations within organisations. This project identified that there were five categories of hurdles:
These key hurdle groups were used a starting point in the development of this tool.
There are currently many green initiatives and research programmes underway in the field of green procurement. Research into similar projects being undertaken by other organisations was undertaken to review the additional potential key organisational barriers identified by these projects. Similar projects identified have been undertaken by London Remade, United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, United States Environmental Protection Agency, UK Environment Agency, UK Department of Trade and Industry, Dresden University and Tufts University.
A questionnaire derived from Dresden University and Tufts University was used as an evaluation tool, as these institutions have developed similar methods to identify barriers to green procurement. Questionnaires were sent to all LEAP partners and also to members of the London Contracts and Suppliers Group (LCSG), which aims to review the performance of the London Boroughs in the fields of purchasing and supply and formulate policy for Greater London as a whole. The questionnaire asked organisations to identify barriers they have or are experiencing in trying to implement effective green procurement, and how organisations have sought to overcome these barriers.
Approximately 70 questionnaires were sent out and 11 were received back (from Municipality of Amaroussion, Greece, Municipality of Holargos, Greece, London Borough of Redbridge, UK, Wandsworth Borough Council, UK, London Borough of Hounslow, UK, Leicester City Council, UK, London Borough of Sutton, UK, London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, UK, Municipality of Kallithea, Greece, Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, UK, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, UK). The responses to these questionnaires were collated to generate an overall list of barriers encountered. The results were as follows:

Barrier | Major | Minor | Not |
lack of training/education | 18% | 64% | 18% |
lack of interest from clients/staff | 27% | 36% | 36% |
lack of interest from others on project teams | 10% | 80% | 10% |
lack of technical understanding from project team | 0% | 20% | 80% |
lack of technical understanding from supplier | 0% | 64% | 36% |
not sure where to get info from | 9% | 55% | 36% |
too expensive | 27% | 73% | 0% |
products not available | 27% | 18% | 55% |
insurance problems | 0% | 36% | 64% |
The following resources were used in the research and development of this document: